Committed to ensuring the sustainable peace, stability, security and prosperity of their states and to developing and strengthening their dynamic and innovative economies; Implementation agreements specify the details of a comprehensive agreement or framework agreement. An implementation agreement almost always requires a new round of negotiations with the parties involved. These negotiations refine and define framework agreements or comprehensive agreements in practice. The aim of the implementation agreements is to develop the modalities and mechanics in order to facilitate the implementation of the comprehensive agreement. The terms of application are not always written formal documents. Sometimes these are oral commitments, exchanges of letters and joint public statements that help accelerate implementation. Because of this fact, it is generally very difficult to keep implementation agreements in mind. Often, the informality of these agreements complicates the engagement of the parties. While formal written implementation agreements often take longer, it is generally considered that the parties are required, serious and obligated to implement them. There are many possible issues that can be incorporated into a peace treaty, such as. B The following: Recognising the importance of a supportive legal framework for the movement of people and goods and the promotion of an ongoing business-friendly environment between them, the parties strive to provide each other with the greatest possible legal cooperation, particularly with regard to mutual legal assistance in civil and commercial matters, in accordance with their national legislation and to conclude specific agreements and agreements in this area.
Another famous example would be the series of peace agreements known as the peace of Westphalia. It has initiated modern diplomacy that integrates the modern system of nation-states. Subsequent wars were no longer about religion, but about state issues. This encouraged the Catholic and Protestant powers to ally themselves, which led to a series of important realignments. The peace treaty was chosen in two versions, one in Egyptian hieroglyphics and the other in Akkadian with cuneiform writing; Both versions survive. Such bilingual registration is common to many subsequent contracts. However, the treaty is different from the others because the two language versions are written differently. Although most of the text is identical, the hittitic version claims that the Egyptians were prosecuted for peace, and the Egyptian version claims otherwise. The contract was given to the Egyptians in the form of a silver plate, and the “pocket book” version was brought back to Egypt and carved in the Temple of Karnak. Peace agreements are not always structured in the same way. Sometimes it is just a document made up of different chapters or discrete components.
In other cases, any essential element may be part of a comprehensive agreement or be a separate agreement negotiated separately and at different times in a peace process. The content of an agreement also differs from conflict to conflict. The nature of war, the contentious issues and how to end the war are factors that will change the structure and content of a peace agreement. Civil or national wars are usually caused by a failure of governance. Peace agreements that end these conflicts often focus on rebuilding governance mechanisms. Disputed issues in intergovernmental wars are normally related to security or territory.